Israel has become a killing machine, and they have killed more people, including some high-level Iranian soldiers. Their intelligence work is exemplary. After Hezbollah, Israel had good tricks up its sleeve over the Iranians, too. This might have given more confidence to Netanyahu’s regime. However, reports claim that Iranian nuclear work may have had some damage, but it will not stop. Secondly, the Iranian regime does not seem to be collapsing. Thus, Israel’s official pretexts are not achieved here. The tension between Iran and Israel is a war of attrition, and lives are expendable. Iranians are readier to spend lives- and they have just got more martyrs. The human toll on the Israeli side will be costlier even if the numbers are lower. Iranian missiles could penetrate the Iron Dome. That means even the most minor damage is detrimental to the Israeli economy in the long run, and it appears that they have sustained more damage than they expected. And of course, Israel once again showed that it cannot survive without the explicit American help. Thus, the Israeli government may have won a few significant victories, but Iranians will be back to a long war of attrition, and now they have seen where Israel failed and succeeded. I have asked Perplexity to curate arguments. You will see them below.
The 12-day war between Iran and Israel ended with a Trump-brokered ceasefire on June 24, 2025, with both sides claiming victory despite conflicting assessments of what was actually achieved12. The conflict began on June 13 when Israel launched surprise strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities and escalated when the U.S. directly joined by targeting Iranian nuclear sites with bunker-busting bombs13.
Israeli Claims of Victory
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu declared a “historic victory” and claimed that “all the goals of the operation have been realized”14. Israel’s victory narrative centers on several key arguments:
Nuclear Program Destruction: Netanyahu stated that Israel had “sent Iran’s nuclear program down the drain” and removed “two existential threats — the threat of destruction via nuclear weapons and the threat of destruction via 20,000 ballistic missiles”5. Israeli military officials claimed their strikes set back Iran’s nuclear program “by many years”6.
Strategic Objectives Met: Israel argued it successfully eliminated the threat posed by Iran’s nuclear and missile capabilities, with Netanyahu asserting that Iran “will not have a nuclear weapon”15. The Israeli military claimed to have destroyed Iran’s ballistic missile production program and delivered “the most severe blow in [the regime’s] history”5.
Military Superiority Demonstrated: Israel successfully conducted complex long-range operations, crossing the threshold of directly attacking Iranian nuclear facilities for the first time2. The campaign demonstrated Israel’s capability to strike deep into Iranian territory with precision3.
U.S. Support Secured: Netanyahu praised the unprecedented American support, with Trump authorizing direct U.S. strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities, calling it “the fruit of a diplomatic campaign”5.
Iranian Claims of Victory
Iran and its supporters present a different narrative, arguing that Israel failed to achieve its stated objectives:
Nuclear Program Survived: Iranian officials and some analysts argue that Iran moved fissionable materials away from targeted facilities before the strikes, meaning the crucial elements of the nuclear program remained intact7. Reports suggest Iran retained control over nearly all of its nuclear materials8.
Regime Stability Maintained: Despite Israeli attempts to destabilize the government by targeting security institutions and military leaders, the Islamic Republic remained intact and did not collapse73. Iran demonstrated resilience against a formidable Israeli force.
Military Effectiveness: Iranian missiles repeatedly breached Israel’s renowned air defense systems, reaching deep into Israeli territory and causing unprecedented casualties and destruction7. Iran successfully struck Israeli population centers and military targets, with 28 Israelis killed69.
International Standing: Iran emerged with its global image largely unblemished, with many viewing it as a victim of Israeli aggression7. The international community seemed to recognize Iran as a legitimate partner, representing a setback for Israel’s isolation efforts.
De-escalation Control: Iran effectively managed the conflict’s conclusion by agreeing to the ceasefire while maintaining its capacity for future response7.
Conflicting Intelligence Assessments
The victory claims are complicated by contradictory intelligence reports. While Trump and Israeli officials claimed to have “obliterated” Iran’s nuclear sites, a classified U.S. intelligence assessment concluded that American strikes only set back Iran’s nuclear program by “a few months” rather than years106. The White House disputed this assessment, calling it “flat-out wrong”108.
The Institute for Science and International Security assessed that strikes had “effectively destroyed” Iran’s enrichment program, but noted it would take a “long time” to restore capabilities3. However, the extent of actual damage remains uncertain, as Iran has not allowed external assessments7.
The Reality of Mixed Outcomes
Both sides’ victory claims reflect the complex nature of modern conflicts where tactical success doesn’t always translate to strategic victory. Israel achieved significant tactical and operational success in demonstrating its long-range strike capabilities and securing unprecedented U.S. support11. However, questions remain about whether the strategic goal of permanently eliminating Iran’s nuclear threat was achieved, given conflicting damage assessments and Iran’s retained nuclear materials8.
The 12-day conflict ultimately highlighted both countries’ military capabilities while leaving fundamental regional tensions unresolved, with the fragile ceasefire dependent on continued restraint from both sides9.
Discover more from Erkan's Field Diary
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.