Disinformation and War Propaganda in the Iran-Israel-US War (As of 23 March 2026)

When I saw this A wave of posts claimed Benjamin Netanyahu was dead. Here’s how it spread. I realized it is time to update the disinformation patterns:

Disinformation and War Propaganda in the Iran-Israel-US War (As of 23 March 2026)

Overview

Since Operation Epic Fury began on 28 February 2026, the Iran-Israel-US conflict has generated an information war of historically unprecedented scale and technological sophistication. Independent fact-checkers, academic researchers, and media watchdogs have documented disinformation, propaganda, and narrative manipulation emanating from all sides of the conflict — the Islamic Republic of Iran, the State of Israel, and the United States government — as well as from financially motivated non-state actors exploiting the conflict for online engagement. The New York Times identified over 110 distinct AI-generated images and videos in the first two weeks of fighting alone, while NewsGuard documented at least 18 false war-related claims from Iranian state media since 28 February. However, a comprehensive and academically rigorous accounting also requires scrutiny of Israeli and American information operations, strategic narrative management, and media suppression.[1][2][3]

This report organises findings into three main actor-groups (Iran, Israel, United States), applies a consistent analytical typology across all three, and identifies cross-cutting structural dynamics driving the broader disinformation environment. It draws on fact-checking organisations (AFP, Reuters, BBC Verify, NewsGuard, PolitiFact), independent research bodies (Citizen Lab, Carnegie Endowment, Institute for Strategic Dialogue), and critical media analysis.

Analytical Typology

To apply equivalent analytic standards to all parties, this report distinguishes five categories of information operation:

1. Direct fabrication: Content that is demonstrably false — AI-generated imagery, recycled footage deliberately miscaptioned, invented statistics — presented as real.
2. Strategic omission and decontextualisation: Authentic content curated or framed to produce a systematically misleading picture; civilian casualties or operational setbacks excluded while successes are amplified.
3. Narrative inflation: Real events exaggerated beyond their verifiable scope — accurate strikes described as total victories, manageable damage described as catastrophic defeat for the enemy.
4. Coordinated inauthentic behaviour (CIB): Organised networks of fake or hijacked accounts amplifying particular narratives, including state-linked influence operations.
5. Meta-disinformation: Labelling accurate or credible reporting as “fake news,” “AI propaganda,” or “enemy disinformation” to delegitimise journalism and erode the informational commons.

Part I: Iranian Disinformation

Direct Fabrications and AI-Generated Content

Iran’s state apparatus and aligned social media networks have produced the largest documented volume of directly fabricated content in this conflict. Since 28 February, NewsGuard found at least 18 false war-related claims by Iranian outlets, compared to five in the preceding two weeks. The Iranian state apparatus has been particularly prolific, often combining AI-generated imagery, recycled footage, and inflated casualty figures into a coherent counter-narrative of military triumph.[2][1]

The most prominent single false claim was that Iranian ballistic missiles had sunk or severely damaged the USS Abraham Lincoln aircraft carrier. An X post claiming “Iranian missiles have sunk USS Abraham Lincoln” reached 8 million views. Multiple AI-generated images of the carrier on fire were circulated; one image had been circulating since 2021, another originated from the June 2025 “Twelve-Day War”. CENTCOM responded explicitly: “The Lincoln was not hit. The missiles launched didn’t even come close”. Shortly after, IRGC spokesperson Ali Mohammad Naini, quoted by Tasnim News Agency, alleged that 650 US personnel were killed or wounded in the first 48 hours of the war, claiming 160 American casualties “in the targeting of a US military headquarters in Bahrain alone”. The US military confirmed only six deaths as of early March.[4][5][1]

Iranian state television broadcaster IRIB TV1 aired old missile footage on the first day of the conflict. In one documented case, the same channel aired footage of an Israeli strike on Iran while narrating a story about Iran striking Israel with long-range missiles. PressTV shared a photo of a Pakistani drone falsely labelled as an “Israeli drone shot down near Natanz”, and Ukrainian war footage was relabelled as imagery of damage in Tel Aviv.[6]

Following the killing of Supreme Leader Khamenei on 28 February, images purporting to show his body buried under rubble spread widely. AFP, Reuters, and BBC Verify confirmed these were AI-generated: one image carried a visible “Meta AI” label, hands were deformed, and Google’s SynthID tool confirmed with “very high confidence” the image was AI-produced.[7][8][9]

Tehran Times published a satellite image purportedly showing the destruction of a US radar at Qatar’s Al-Udeid Air Base, captioned “An American radar in Qatar was completely destroyed today in an Iranian drone strike.” Information warfare analyst Tal Hagin demonstrated that the image was a Google Earth frame from February 2025, AI-manipulated — “one way to tell is that all the cars stayed in the exact same location”. Mehrannews claimed four Iranian ballistic missiles hit the USS Abraham Lincoln; CENTCOM denied even a near-miss.[1]

IRGC-linked Telegram channels initially celebrated a viral video as proof of an Iranian fighter jet shooting down a US F-15 over Tehran; the Israeli Air Force subsequently confirmed the footage actually showed an F-35 shooting down an Iranian Yak-130. Researchers identified multiple instances of ARMA 3 video game footage — including explosions and drone combat — circulating as authentic strike footage on TikTok, in some cases linked to Russian influence operations.[10][11][1]

AFP fact-checkers debunked images of vehicles on fire in Tel Aviv as originating from the January 2026 anti-government protests in Tehran (Kaj Square). Reuters again debunked a “new” Iranian strike video on Tel Aviv as footage from June 2025. India Today identified multiple fresh viral clips in the second week of March — a 2024 attack on Israel’s Nevatim airbase, a 2025 missile barrage, and an unrelated US plane crash — all relabelled as 2026 strikes.[12][13][14]

Elite Betrayal Narratives

A recurring category of Iranian-origin disinformation involves dramatic “betrayal” narratives about high-ranking military figures. Since early March, various X accounts and regional outlets have claimed Quds Force commander Esmail Qaani was arrested or executed by the IRGC as an Israeli/Mossad asset. As of 23 March, there is no confirmation from Iranian state media, major Western outlets, or independent verifiers. A Farsi-language account aligned with Mossad itself denied the claim. Similar narratives circulated and were similarly denied in 2025.[15][16][17][18]

A viral clip of a man shooting himself on camera was rebranded as “the Iranian general who betrayed Khamenei and killed himself live on TV.” Fact-checkers in India and Nigeria traced it to an October 2024 Kurdish video of a private suicide on Instagram Live, with no connection to the Iranian command structure.[19][20]

Staged POW Narratives

Beginning around 5–7 March, images and videos purportedly showing US Delta Force operators captured by the IRGC went viral in multiple languages. AFP confirmed the key still images were AI-generated — they carry AI watermarks, show distorted hands, duplicated limbs, and inconsistent uniforms. Iran’s senior security official Ali Larijani publicly claimed on X that US soldiers had been taken prisoner, but US Central Command and the Pentagon denied that any personnel have been captured and confirmed there are no US ground troops in Iran.[21][22][23][24][25]

During the June 2025 phase, a photo of Chilean Navy pilot Daniela Figueroa Scholz was widely circulated as an “Israeli pilot captured by Iran”; Reuters and PolitiFact confirmed it was from a Chilean Navy graduation ceremony.[26][27]

Coordinated Information Salvos

The New York Times reported on 19 March that Iran is combining missile strikes, disinformation pushes, and cyber operations in what analysts describe as coordinated “information salvos”. Telegram channels and social accounts masquerading as Americans, Israelis, and Europeans have been used to amplify narratives about mass US losses. One account that had previously posted about Scottish independence was found to have covertly pivoted to pro-Iran war narratives. Analysts at Recorded Future’s Insikt Group observed: “What we are observing in the realm of influence is Iran deploying every capability available to them in this conflict”.[28]

A Carnegie Endowment analysis notes that Iran’s government is strategically deploying its wartime internet access policy as a political tool, controlling information flow domestically while directing outward-facing content at diaspora communities, Global South solidarity networks, and the anti-war left — groups that now have genuine documented evidence of civilian casualties from foreign strikes to work with.[29]

Part II: Israeli Disinformation and Propaganda

The PRISONBREAK Influence Operation

The most extensively documented Israeli-side information operation is “PRISONBREAK,” uncovered by Citizen Lab at the University of Toronto in collaboration with Clemson University’s Media Forensics Hub. The operation consists of more than 50 inauthentic X profiles spreading regime-change narratives at Iranian audiences using AI-generated content including synthetic profile pictures, fabricated BBC Persian news screenshots, and automated synchronized posting. The network was created in 2023 but became active primarily from January 2025 onward, escalating in direct coordination with IDF operations.[30][31][32][33]

Most strikingly, a deepfake video of the Evin Prison bombing appeared on X within roughly one hour of the actual IDF airstrike — timing that implies either foreknowledge or a pre-staged contingency pipeline. That video deceived multiple international news outlets before BBC Persian flagged it as fabricated. Israeli Minister of Foreign Affairs Gideon Sa’ar reposted the AI-manipulated Evin Prison bombing video. Citizen Lab assesses with high confidence that the operation was conducted by an unidentified agency of the Israeli government or a contractor working under its close supervision. The report places PRISONBREAK within a documented seven-year pattern of Israeli intelligence alumni firms running covert synthetic-persona campaigns globally, referencing Team Jorge and Archimedes Group as precedents.[31][32]

Israeli-aligned networks have also circulated synthetic videos of pro-Israel protests in Tehran, falsely suggesting popular dissent against the Iranian government. These directly mirror the broader regime-change messaging that Netanyahu himself has pursued publicly — on 1 March 2026 and again on 10 March, Netanyahu directly addressed “the People of Iran” on X, calling on them to “take to the streets in your millions to finish the job, to overthrow the regime”.[34][2][29]

Netanyahu Death Rumours and the Netanyahu AI Deepfake Crisis

From approximately 13 March, viral claims circulated — amplified by Iranian state media and various X and Reddit threads — that Netanyahu had died and that his subsequent public appearances were AI deepfakes. The rumours were partly seeded by a video in which Netanyahu appeared to have a sixth finger on one hand. Netanyahu posted a video from a Jerusalem café on 15 March specifically to counter these claims, visibly displaying five fingers and joking he was “dying for coffee”. Despite extensive verification by multiple media organisations confirming the café video was authentic, the rumours continued to circulate.[35][36][37][38]

Professor Monica Attard from the Centre for Media Transition at the University of Technology Sydney observed: “This is probably the first instance where a world leader has used the five fingers on both hands to indicate that this is not a fake video”. Grok, X’s integrated AI chatbot, posted contradictory assessments of the café video — sometimes calling it authentic, sometimes calling it a deepfake — minute to minute.[36][37]

South Pars Attribution Dispute

On approximately 19 March, Israel struck Iran’s South Pars gas field — the world’s largest natural gas field, co-operated with Qatar. Trump immediately posted on Truth Social: “The United States knew nothing about this particular attack”. The following day, three Israeli officials told the New York Times, speaking on condition of anonymity, that the United States had been notified before the strike. Former US Ambassador to Israel Dan Shapiro wrote on X: “Zero chance the IDF carries out a strike in that location without giving CENTCOM the full picture. Trump knew (and approved)”. Netanyahu then appeared to acknowledge coordination, saying “I told him don’t do that” while Trump said “we get great… it’s coordinated”. Netanyahu later confirmed at a press conference that “Israel acted alone against the Asaluyeh gas compound” but that “President Trump asked us to hold off on future attacks”.[39][40][41][42]

This episode illustrates how the US-Israel alliance itself produces conflicting public statements about operational facts — a form of intra-coalition confusion that bleeds into the disinformation environment.

Israeli Media Censorship and Narrative Control

Israel’s military censor issued new directives during the conflict placing strict restrictions on how Israeli journalists can report the impact of Iranian strikes on Israeli territory, warning against reports that could indicate “attack positions or air defence operations, or damage assessments that could assist the enemy”. The circular explicitly cautioned that some reports may be “enemy-generated fake news”. According to the International Federation of Journalists, Israel has killed at least 164 journalists in Gaza since October 7, 2023, with additional deaths in Lebanon and Iran.[43]

Critical media analysts noted that Israeli television studios have functioned as “war rooms” dominated by retired generals repeating government lines, with minimal space for dissenting assessments. Israeli journalists’ union director Anat Saragusti stated: “I feel that they are lying to us”. The Al Jazeera Institute documented how Netanyahu’s and Trump’s speeches have shaped Western media language, with segments of Western coverage echoing their political framing.[44][45]

Part III: US Government Propaganda and Disinformation

The Nuclear “Obliteration” Contradiction

One of the most significant US-side credibility failures involves the fate of Iran’s nuclear program. In June 2025, the White House issued an official statement titled “Iran’s Nuclear Facilities Have Been Obliterated — and Suggestions Otherwise are Fake News”. President Trump declared: “Monumental Damage was done to all Nuclear sites in Iran… Obliteration is an accurate term!” Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth stated: “Based on everything we have seen — and I’ve seen it all — our bombing campaign obliterated Iran’s ability to create nuclear weapons”. When CNN reported a Defence Intelligence Agency assessment that Iran’s nuclear capabilities had been set back only “a few months” — not eliminated — White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt dismissed it as “flat-out wrong” and accused unnamed leakers of attempting to “demean” Trump.[46][47][48]

Nine months later, in March 2026, Trump launched Operation Epic Fury citing an “imminent nuclear threat” from Iran. This direct contradiction prompted significant public commentary and a widely circulated Reddit thread asking: “did the administration mislead the public, or were they simply mistaken?”. As a Reddit user summarised: the narrative of ‘fake news’ applied to the DIA assessment in June 2025 may not hold true given the subsequent necessity of a new war. Neither the CIA nor the Director of National Intelligence has commented publicly on either assessment.[47][49]

Operation Epic Fury: Omission of Civilian Casualties

White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt’s briefings on Operation Epic Fury illustrate strategic omission at the governmental level. On 3 March, she declared “Iran’s murderous, terrorist leaders are paying for their crimes against America — and they are playing in blood” and that “killing these brutal terrorists is good for America”. When a journalist asked whether a US strike had hit a girls’ elementary school in Minab and killed 175 people — as multiple news agencies reported — Leavitt replied “Not that we know of” and stated that the Department of War was investigating. PBS NewsHour reported that a US official briefed on an initial review said the strike was “likely American,” and satellite imagery and video confirmed six US targets struck in the area including the school. Iran later released what it said was missile debris from the Minab strike as evidence linking the US to the attack. Independent analysis placed the confirmed death toll at 165 people.[50][51][52][53][54][55]

On the opening hours of the operation, CENTCOM stated there were “no reports of US casualties or combat-related injuries” and that US installations had suffered “minimal damage that has not impacted operations”. By mid-March, CENTCOM had confirmed the deaths of six service members and 18 seriously wounded.[56][57][58]

The Iran Ceasefire False Claim

On approximately 14–15 March, Trump repeatedly claimed that Iran “wants to make a deal,” that Iran was “totally defeated,” and that Tehran had been seeking ceasefire terms he had rejected. Iran’s Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi gave an interview to CBS News’ Face the Nation explicitly contradicting this: “Iran has never asked for a ceasefire and has never asked even for negotiation.” Araghchi added: “There are people being killed only because President Trump wants to have fun. This is a war of choice by President Trump”. The Times of Israel, NPR, and Time all confirmed the direct contradiction between Trump’s claim and Araghchi’s public statement.[59][60][58][61]

“Boom Boom” Victory Reels

CNN and Arab American News documented Pentagon-aligned “boom boom” video reels — precision-bomb footage set to upbeat music with triumphant captions about “degrading Iranian capability” — circulating across social media as unofficial but government-aligned promotional content. These are not fabricated footage in a strict technical sense but are heavily curated, decontextualised products designed to sell the operation to domestic audiences while omitting civilian harm, operational setbacks, and strategic uncertainty.[62][63]

Media Suppression as Epistemic Interference

The Trump administration’s campaign against independent media coverage constitutes a documented instance of state-level meta-disinformation. On 15 March, FCC Chair Brendan Carr warned television broadcasters that they could risk losing their licences over Iran war coverage he characterised as “hoaxes” or “news distortions”. The warning explicitly followed Defense Secretary Hegseth’s criticism of CNN at Pentagon briefings and Trump’s Truth Social posts labelling the New York Times and Wall Street Journal as wanting the US to “lose the war”.[64][65][66][67]

The New York Times reported that Trump was “contemplating ‘Charges for TREASON'” against journalists providing critical assessments. Democratic leaders, including California Governor Gavin Newsom, argued that threatening to revoke broadcast licences over war coverage would be unconstitutional. Senator Brian Schatz warned the threats could pressure media organisations to provide only favourable coverage. Press freedom advocates described such threats as “highly unusual in the United States”. Mondoweiss noted that Trump equated mainstream reporting with AI-generated pro-Iran propaganda — collapsing the distinction between fabrication and journalism in a way that serves the administration’s communications interest.[66][68][67]

Part IV: AI Platforms and Structural Amplifiers

AI Chatbots as Unreliable Arbiters

Users have turned to AI chatbots to verify suspicious war content, with counterproductive results. Atlantic Council Digital Forensic Research Lab tabulated over 300 responses by Grok (X’s integrated AI) to a single AI-generated video of a bombed airport; responses contradicted each other minute to minute, sometimes calling the video “likely real,” sometimes “likely not authentic”. Grok similarly posted contradictory assessments of the Netanyahu café video. Google AI Overviews validated a false story about a “CIA outpost in Dubai” being hit — the underlying footage was a 2015 residential fire in Sharjah. NewsGuard documented the failure systematically.[37][69][70][10]

Monetisation and Engagement Farming

X’s Creator Revenue Sharing programme creates direct financial incentives for sensational war content. Anonymous accounts farming AI-generated strike videos have accrued millions of views and significant earnings before platform intervention. On 3 March, X announced a 90-day suspension from its Creator Revenue Sharing programme for creators who post undisclosed AI-generated armed conflict content. Repeat offenders face permanent suspension. The policy covers only AI-generated content and not disinformation more broadly. BBC Verify explicitly framed the monetisation dynamic as a defining feature of the conflict: the war is being “cashed in” by a global layer of engagement farmers alongside state actors.[71][72][73][74][10]

The “Liar’s Dividend”

Perhaps the deepest structural problem is what Carnegie Endowment researcher describes as “the liar’s dividend” — the phenomenon whereby the deliberate contamination of the information environment by bad actors on all sides eventually undermines the credibility of legitimate information. For Iran specifically, this creates a paradox: years of AI-generated disinformation about Israeli attacks mean that when Iran has genuine, verifiable civilian casualties from US and Israeli strikes — including the Minab school bombing — those authentic claims are no longer readily believed by international audiences. The same dynamic operates in reverse: when Western fact-checkers debunk Iranian fabrications with some success, the repeated invocation of “fake news” by US and Israeli officials to deflect credible critical reporting degrades the same fact-checking infrastructure they implicitly rely on.[29]

Comparative Analysis

The table below summarises the primary disinformation categories documented for each actor as of 23 March 2026.

Discussion: Disinformation as a Strategic Instrument

The Iran-Israel-US war has produced what researchers are calling the first truly “AI-native” conflict information environment. Several analytical observations follow from the evidence reviewed here.[2]

Asymmetry in fabrication volume does not imply asymmetry in propaganda effect. Iran has produced the highest documented volume of directly fabricated content. However, US and Israeli information operations achieve their effects through different means — narrative framing, strategic omission, media censorship, and the delegitimisation of independent journalism. The cumulative epistemic damage may be equivalent even if the technical form differs. A school bombing that is not investigated is not less real than a school bombing that is denied.

“Fake news” has become a universal political instrument. All three principal actors in this conflict have used “fake news” as a rhetorical device to deflect credible criticism: Iran dismisses US/Israeli claims as “the repetition of big lies”; Netanyahu labels inconvenient narratives as “fake news”; and Trump threatens journalists with treason charges while labelling intelligence assessments as “flat-out wrong”. This semantic inflation corrodes the term’s utility for legitimate fact-checking.[79][68][77][78][66]

Platform architecture actively worsens the problem. X’s revenue-sharing model financially rewards sensational war content; Google AI Overviews amplify false claims during reverse image searches; Grok provides contradictory real-time “verification”. These are systemic, not episodic, failures.[69][74][10][71]

The PRISONBREAK precedent is underappreciated. Citizen Lab’s documentation of a state-linked influence operation that pre-stages deepfakes for deployment within hours of actual military strikes represents a qualitative escalation in information warfare — the synchronisation of kinetic and narrative operations at machine speed. This has received considerably less public attention than Iranian AI fakes, despite its comparable strategic significance.[32][31]

Iran’s “liar’s dividend” problem. Carnegie Endowment’s analysis captures an irony specific to this conflict: Iran’s years-long disinformation machine has contaminated the information space so thoroughly that its legitimate victimhood claims — civilian casualties, damage to civilian infrastructure — are now viewed with deep scepticism by international audiences. The regime’s information architecture has, paradoxically, undermined the credibility it most needs when it most needs it.[29]

Conclusion

The disinformation and propaganda environment of the 2026 Iran-Israel-US war is multi-directional, multi-modal, and deeply entangled with AI-generated content, platform incentives, and state media management. Iran’s state apparatus and allied networks have produced the highest volume of directly fabricated imagery and inflated battlefield claims, including AI-generated proof of military victories that did not occur. Israel’s documented PRISONBREAK influence operation represents a qualitatively significant deployment of AI-assisted coordinated inauthentic behaviour timed to kinetic military operations. The United States government has engaged in strategic narrative inflation, the deliberate downplaying of civilian casualties, contradictory public claims about the war’s objectives and Iran’s nuclear status, and an active campaign to suppress and delegitimise independent journalism through regulatory and rhetorical threats.

Fact-checkers and verification organisations — AFP, BBC Verify, Reuters, NewsGuard, Citizen Lab, and others — remain the principal institutional bulwark against the most egregious falsehoods. However, their work operates in structural tension with AI chatbots that provide unreliable verdicts, monetisation incentives that reward fabrication, and state actors on all sides who have an interest in undermining trust in independent verification as such.

For researchers and journalists covering this conflict, the most productive analytical frame is not “who lies more” but rather: what specific types of information manipulation does each actor deploy, for what strategic purposes, through what channels, and with what measurable effects on public understanding? The evidence reviewed here suggests that all three principal parties are engaged in systematic information operations, differing primarily in form and scale rather than in kind.

References

1. Iran’s state media ramps up disinformation campaign, report – Iran’s state media outlets have significantly increased disinformation efforts, including alleged ba…
2. Disinfo is rewriting Iran conflict in real time. In ‘first truly AI- … – In the days since US-Israel attacked Iran on 28 February, bad actors have overwhelmed social media f…
3. Cascade of A.I. Fakes About War With Iran Causes Chaos … – A torrent of fake videos and images generated by artificial intelligence have overrun social network…
4. IRGC claim of 650 US troops killed or wounded proven false – IRGC claim of 650 US troops killed or wounded proven false. The US military has so far confirmed the…
5. Videos do not show missile strike on USS Abraham Lincoln – PolitiFact – Social media users claimed Iran struck and damaged the USS Abraham Lincoln aircraft carrier. But the…
6. RFE/RL Fact Check: Recycled Videos And Photos Fuel Iran’s … – Iranian state media has reused old videos and images — from Russian missile launches to Pakistani dr…
7. Images of Iran’s supreme leader buried by rubble are AI-generated
8. Fact Check: Image of Khamenei’s body trapped beneath rubble is made with AI – An image depicting emergency workers discovering the body of Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Kh…
9. Images of Iran’s supreme leader buried by rubble are AI … – Iran’s supreme leader was killed by joint US-Israel strikes that began on February 28, 2026, but ima…
10. As the U.S. wages war with Iran, social media users face worsening disinformation – Bots, misleading images, AI-generated video, and even Google searches complicate reporting out of Ir…
11. Real attack or video game? Misinformation and war in the AI age – Is it real or is it AI? Misinformation seen by millions is spreading online in the wake of the war i…
12. Fact Check: If you think these videos show current Israel-Iran war, you are mistaken – India Today Fact Check found that all three videos are old and unrelated to the ongoing war. One of …
13. Old Iran protest footage shared as missile attack on Tel … – Scenes of destruction from the ongoing war in the Middle East have been widely depicted on social me…
14. Old video of Iranian strikes on Tel Aviv presented as new – After Iran’s Supreme ​Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei was killed by ​U.S. and Israeli strikes, Iran re…
15. Mystery deepens around Iran’s Qaani and the spy question – Unverified claims online suggest he has been detained, or even executed, for spying for Israel
16. Was Esmail Qaani, ‘man with nine lives’ executed for being an Israeli … – Unconfirmed reports suggest that Esmail Qaani, head of Iran’s Quds Force, was arrested and possibly …
17. IRGC Quds Force Commander Esmail Ghaani reportedly detained … – Esmail Ghaani, commander of the Quds Force of Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), has r…
18. Account claiming Mossad links denies Iran’s Quds Force chief is … – Mossad Farsi social media page rejects claims that Esmail Qaani was compromised, as IRGC commander r…
19. Video Of Suicide On Camera Shared As ‘General Who Betrayed … – BOOM found that the video dates back to October 2024 and, according to Kurdish outlets, shows a man …
20. FACT-CHECK: Did a General accused of betraying Iran’s Ayatollah … – CLAIMS: A viral video circulating across social media platforms claims that a military general who a…
21. ‘Delta Force Captured by IRGC’ Viral Claim Busted — AI Fake Designed to Stir War Panic – A viral claim of US Delta Force soldiers captured by Iran’s IRGC has been debunked as an AI-generate…
22. US soldiers taken prisoners? Iran’s big claim; Washington denies | Middle East Crisis – In a big statement, Security Advisor to Iranian regime, Ali Larijani claimed to capture US soldier. …
23. Iran’s top security official claims US soldiers captured – Anadolu Ajansı – Iran’s top security official, Ali Larijani, claimed Sunday that American soldiers have been captured…
24. Images depicting capture of American solders in Iran are AI-generated – But the images purporting to show several more captured by Iranian forces are fake. Each of the imag…
25. CENTCOM denies claims US troops taken prisoner in Iran – In his post, Larijani claimed that several US soldiers had been captured during Operation Epic Fury,…
26. Fact Check: Chilean Navy pilot falsely said online to be an Israeli … – An image of a Chilean Navy pilot has been falsely described online as showing an Israeli pilot captu…
27. Photo shows Chilean pilot, not Israeli pilot captured by Iran – PolitiFact – Pro-Iranian accounts shared an image of a female pilot, claiming she’s an Israeli pilot who was capt…
28. Iran Combines Real-World Missile Attacks With Online … – Iran launched a missile strike, a disinformation push and a cyberattack targeting Israel all at the …
29. Iran Wields Wartime Internet Access as a Political Tool – On March 10, 2026, Iran’s government spokesperson Fatemeh Mohajerani made a notable public admission…
30. AI-Enabled Influence Operation Against Iran – Citizen Lab has uncovered a coordinated AI-enabled influence operation against the Iranian governmen…
31. Israeli-Linked AI Influence Operation PRISONBREAK … – The operation deployed AI-generated deepfake videos — including footage of the Evin Prison bombing p…
32. We Say You Want a Revolution: PRISONBREAK – An AI- … – It is an account promoting closeness between the Israeli and Iranian populations, and explicitly usi…
33. Alleged AI-Enabled PRISONBREAK Influence Operation … – Incident 1221: Alleged AI-Enabled PRISONBREAK Influence Operation on X Reportedly Synchronizes Deepf…
34. Behind the Bombs, New Details Emerge on Iran’s Infiltration of … – The Israeli campaign to infiltrate and undermine Iranian society has included recruiting individual …
35. Is Netanyahu dead? Figuring out misinformation and how … – The longer the lag between the spread of fake news and the … Distinguishing AI-manipulated footage…
36. Rumours that Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu … – … deep fake … but [it was] propelled by X and by threads on Reddit which claim that, ‘No, no, no, …
37. euronews | Did Netanyahu use AI to prove he’s still alive? … – … Netanyahu’s video is fake. Groc also posted contradictory information which included claims the …
38. Netanyahu Posts Coffee Video To Dismiss Death Rumours – Netanyahu Mocks Death Hoax During Press Conference — ‘I’m alive’ … Is the Netanyahu café video an …
39. Trump says he is ‘not putting troops’ in Iran as war continues – Trump said he had told Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu not to strike any more Iranian gas …
40. Contradicting Trump, Israeli Officials Say U.S. Was Told about South Pars Attack – President Trump first said the United States ‘knew nothing’ about an attack on the gas field in Iran…
41. Ex-Israel Envoy Challenges Trump’s Claim of No Prior … – The strikes were described as retaliation for the Israeli attack on the South Pars gas field. … WH…
42. Trump warns to ‘blow up’ South Pars gas field in Iran if strikes against Qatar energy continue – World leaders are scrambling to contain a spiraling Middle East conflict on Thursday after Israel an…
43. How does Israel restrict its media from reporting on the Iran … – … censor, cautioning – as a side note – that some may be “enemy-generated fake news”. The new rest…
44. Are Netanyahu and Trump’s Speeches Shaping Western … – As political speeches framed the 2026 U.S.–Israeli attack on Iran, segments of Western media echoed …
45. ‘They’re lying to us’: Why Israel’s media isn’t challenging Netanyahu’s narrative on the Iran war – Recalling the first day of the war with Iran is still traumatic for journalist and activistAnat Sar…
46. White House slams leaked CNN report as ‘fake news,’ claims Iran’s … – Former IDF General, Amir Avivi said Iran’s uranium enrichment was set back “many, many years” from t…
47. Intelligence report claims US didn’t ‘obliterate’ Iran nuke … – In a post on Truth social, Donald Trump said that the report was fake and aimed at demanding the mil…
48. Iran’s Nuclear Facilities Have Been Obliterated – Iran’s Nuclear Facilities Have Been Obliterated — and Suggestions Otherwise are Fake News … The wo…
49. In June 2025, the White House put out a statement titled ” … – But 9 months earlier the administration said the program was obliterated and suggestions to the cont…
50. PBS NewsHour – … civilian casualty event since U.S. and Israeli attacks on Iran … Operation Epic Fury, the join…
51. On the first day of the war with Iran, a missile strike … – … Operation Epic Fury, the joint U.S.-Israeli strikes that began February 28. … school, civilian…
52. Iran says new evidence links US to deadly school attack … – … civilian casualty event since U.S. and Israeli attacks on Iran … Operation Epic Fury, the join…
53. ‘Killing these brutal terrorists is good for America,’ Leavitt … – Her remarks come amid “Operation Epic Fury,” a campaign targeting Iran’s military infrastructure and…
54. ‘Killing these brutal terrorists is good for America,’ Leavitt says of … – Her remarks come amid “Operation Epic Fury,” a campaign targeting Iran’s military infrastructure and…
55. Data Analysis of the State of the Iranian Conflict on March … – In the early hours of February 28, 2026, Operation Epic Fury began. US and Israeli strikes hit Iran …
56. 500 Israeli, US military, strategic sites hit in escalating war … – At least 555 people have been killed across Iran in the joint US-Israeli attacks on 131 counties so …
57. CENTCOM says no US casualties in joint strikes on Iran – The US military’s Central Command (CENTCOM) on Saturday said there were no reports of US casualties …
58. ‘We never asked for a ceasefire,’ says Iran’s foreign … – Trump told NBC News on Saturday that Iran was ready “to make a deal, and I don’t want to make it bec…
59. As of March 15, 2026, Iran has explicitly rejected claims … – Iran firmly denies any formal ceasefire deal with Israel, directly rejecting President Trump’s claim…
60. Iran Denies Seeking Ceasefire, Sees ‘No Reason’ to Talk … – The comments come after President Trump claimed Iran had asked for a ceasefire and he had rejected t…
61. Iran FM claims Tehran never sought ceasefire or talks with … – Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said Sunday that Tehran had neither requested a ceasefire no…
62. ‘Boom Boom’ US propaganda vs. the emerging Iran war … – An AI-generated video depicts a fake scene in which captured US soldiers are held by Iranian soldier…
63. Trump and Hegseth cannot define the truth of the U.S.- … – An opinion explores growing distrust in media, political influence over journalism and the consequen…
64. ‘We never asked for a ceasefire,’ says Iran’s foreign … – Israel announced a barrage of new strikes on western Iran on Sunday, while Iran’s foreign minister s…
65. Trump officials target media over Iran war reporting – FCC Chair Brendan Carr threatened to revoke broadcasters’ licenses over Iran war coverage, a day aft…
66. With Threats and Claims of ‘Treason,’ Trump Pressures … – With Threats and Claims of ‘Treason,’ Trump Pressures Media on the War. A president who calls journa…
67. Press freedom under threat? FCC warning to US media – Press freedom advocates say such threats are highly unusual in the United States. … War on Iran: U…
68. Trump suggests treason charges for journalists as Iran war … – You know a war probably isn’t going well when the President starts threatening media outlets with tr…
69. < As Iran and Israel fought, people turned to AI for facts. They didn’t find many – AI-generated videos of fighting between Iran and Israel went viral, and people asked chatbots if the…
70. AI fakes, recycled clips flood Israel-US-Iran conflict narrative; 14 social media posts debunked – Misinformation is spreading rapidly online amid West Asia tensions. Press Trust of India’s Fact Chec…
71. X to take action against AI deepfakes of the Iran conflict – Nikita Bier, the platform’s head of product, said users who don’t add AI disclosures will be suspend…
72. X Will Penalize Creators Who Share AI-Generated War Videos … – The policy update comes two days after a Wired investigation found X drowning in misinformation abou…
73. X suspends revenue sharing for undisclosed AI war videos – Social media platform X announced Tuesday it would suspend creators from its revenue sharing program…
74. AI-generated Iran war videos surge as creators use new … – An unprecedented wave of AI-generated misinformation about the US-Israel war with Iran is being mone…
75. Israel- US Attack on Iran: Daily Status Update – Gov.il – Netanyahu issued a clarification on March 20, labeling the outrage “fake news” and explaining that h…
76. Misinformation is spreading with even official US and … – Misinformation is spreading with even official US and Iranian accounts sharing videos produced using…
77. Iran dismisses US, Israeli ‘disinformation’ about its nuclear program … – Iranian remarks come after US president’s 2026 State of Union speech during which he vowed not to le…
78. Iran war: Netanyahu denies Israel ‘dragged’ US into conflict – Benjamin Netanyahu dismisses reports that Israel dragged the US into the war as ‘fake news’; Iran th…
79. Israel defends role in Middle East conflict – ABC listen – … war as ‘fake news’. It comes as the global oil shock escalates, after Israel and Iran traded mis…