İlber Ortaylı (1947–2026): The Historian, the Media Celebrity, and the Ideologue

I was once a trainer in an EU-funded project, and I spent a few hours with Prof. Ortaylı in 2015 in one of its workshops. I was really anxious about whether he would make fun of me, but he did not (!).

According to the project page of RUMVADER (Cemaat Vakıfları Temsilciliği), it was the 3rd workshop of the “Sosyal Medya ve Azınlıklar” project was held in İzmir.  Dr. İlber Ortaylı gave a talk on minorities and history, followed by me to deliver a short social media training. The project is described in their 2016 activity report as a European Union–supported initiative aimed at bringing together minority communities around the theme of social media, strengthening internal dialogue, and improving their relationship with the broader society, with local events in İstanbul, İzmir, Gökçeada, Antakya, and a Brussels visit

İlber Ortaylı (1947–2026): The Historian, the Media Celebrity, and the Ideologue

Death and Circumstances

İlber Ortaylı, Turkey’s most recognizable public historian and one of its most ubiquitous media intellectuals, died on March 13, 2026, at the age of 78, at Koç University Hospital in Istanbul. He had undergone prostate surgery in January 2026 and subsequently developed kidney complications that required a second operation. He had been in intensive care for over a week and was intubated as his condition deteriorated. His family announced the death through his social media accounts, stating: “We lost the elder of our family, İlber Ortaylı, on March 13, 2026”.[1][2][3][4][5][6]

The outpouring of public grief was instantaneous and predictable. In death, as in life, Ortaylı was treated as a national monument rather than a figure deserving critical scrutiny. Yet his half-century career — spanning genuine scholarly work, an unprecedented media empire, and increasingly provocative ideological interventions — demands a more honest accounting.

Early Life and Academic Foundations

İlber Ortaylı was born on May 21, 1947, in a refugee camp in Bregenz, Austria, to a Crimean Tatar family fleeing Stalinist persecution. The family immigrated to Turkey when he was two years old. He grew up trilingual — Turkish, German, and Russian — and would eventually claim proficiency in over a dozen languages, including Ottoman Turkish, Arabic, Persian, Italian, French, Latin, and several Slavic languages.[7][1]

His academic pedigree was undeniably impressive. He studied at Ankara University’s Faculty of Political Sciences and the Faculty of Language, History, and Geography simultaneously. He completed a master’s degree under the supervision of Halil İnalcık at the University of Chicago, one of the foremost Ottoman historians of the twentieth century. His doctoral thesis on provincial administration after the Tanzimat was completed at Ankara University in 1978, and he became an associate professor in 1979.[8][7]

In a gesture that would be mythologized in his public biography, Ortaylı resigned from his position at Ankara University in 1982 to protest academic policies imposed after the 1980 military coup. He later taught at various European universities — Vienna, Berlin, Paris, Princeton, Moscow, and Cambridge among them — before returning to Ankara University as a full professor in 1989. From 2005 to 2012, he served as director of the Topkapı Palace Museum.[7][1][8]

His genuine scholarly contributions were concentrated in this early and middle period. His 1978 doctoral thesis, Tanzimat Devrinde Osmanlı Mahallî İdareleri (1840–1880) (“Ottoman Local Administrations in the Tanzimat Period”), published by the Turkish Historical Society, was a methodical archival study of how the nineteenth-century Ottoman state attempted to construct a modern system of local governance — examining provincial administrative councils, the creation of modern municipalities, and the tension between centralization and European reform demands. His 1979 associate professorship thesis, Osmanlı İmparatorluğunda Alman Nüfuzu (“German Influence in the Ottoman Empire”), traced the vectors of German political, military, and cultural penetration into the late Ottoman state. His Türkiye İdare Tarihi (“Administrative History of Turkey,” 1979) and Tanzimat’tan Cumhuriyet’e Yerel Yönetim Geleneği (“The Tradition of Local Governance from Tanzimat to the Republic,” 1985) extended this institutional analysis of Ottoman-to-Republican administrative continuities.[9][10][11][7]

His most widely read academic work, İmparatorluğun En Uzun Yüzyılı (“The Empire’s Longest Century,” first published 1983), offered a sweeping interpretation of nineteenth-century Ottoman modernization — arguing that the Tanzimat was not merely a series of Western-imposed reforms but an internally driven, autochthonous process of transformation that encompassed the entire empire’s diverse populations. Eventually translated into several languages, the book became a standard university text in Turkey for courses on Ottoman diplomatic history and modernization. His English-language Studies on Ottoman Transformation (1994) collected papers on the political, economic, social, and cultural changes of the Empire’s last centuries, including the millet system, Ottoman-Russian relations, provincial structures in port cities, and the background of modernization efforts dating to the 1683 Vienna siege. His Hukuk ve İdare Adamı Olarak Osmanlı Devletinde Kadı (“The Kadı as a Legal and Administrative Figure in the Ottoman State,” 1994) examined the multifaceted role of the kadı — judge, tax collector, administrator, and municipal overseer — in Ottoman governance.[12][10][13][14][15][7]

These works, rooted in Ottoman-language archival sources and enriched by Ortaylı’s multilingual access to German, French, Russian, and other scholarly traditions, constituted a genuine contribution to the field of Ottoman administrative and institutional history. Even Hakan Erdem, his most rigorous critic, acknowledged in Tarih-Lenk that Ortaylı’s academic publications — from Tanzimat’tan Sonra Mahalli İdareler through Osmanlı İmparatorluğunda Alman Nüfuzu — were “harmless, indeed respectable academic works”.[16]

But the temporal gap between this serious scholarship and what came later was vast. As the Daily Sabah noted in a 2015 profile, “his academic studies are from the 1960s to the 1980s. He has been a teacher, speaker, and popular writer of Turkish, Balkan, Russian, and European history since the mid-1980s”. This gap — between the archivist-scholar of the 1970s and the television sage of the 2000s — would become the defining tension of his career.[17]

The Making of a Media Phenomenon

From Historian to Celebrity Brand

Ortaylı’s transformation from a respected academic into a mass-media phenomenon began in the 1980s with popular discussion panels and accelerated relentlessly through the 1990s and 2000s. A Bilkent University thesis dedicated to his role explicitly frames him as the central figure in “the popularization of history in Turkey,” noting that through “countless television programs and media appearances” combined with his “unique personality,” Ortaylı “became a well-known figure and gained a special place in the public eye”.[18][17]

The mechanics of this celebrity machine were distinctive. Ortaylı developed a recognizable persona: the grumpy, erudite professor who berates the ignorant, drops historical anecdotes with theatrical flair, and treats every interlocutor as intellectually beneath him. This persona was commodified across multiple platforms — he became a fixture on programs like Habertürk’s Teke Tek, where host Fatih Altaylı regularly featured him; he appeared on KAFA TV’s Cahille Sohbeti Kestim (“I Cut Off Conversation With the Ignorant”), a show whose very title embodied his brand of intellectual condescension; and he held court on CNN Türk, Sözcü TV, A Haber, tv100, and virtually every major Turkish channel willing to lend him airtime.[19][20][21][22][6]

The Self-Help Historian

Perhaps the most telling marker of Ortaylı’s drift from scholarship was his bestselling book Bir Ömür Nasıl Yaşanır? (“How Should One Live a Life?”), published in 2020. Listed and sold as a “personal development” (kişisel gelişim) book, it offered life advice — on career choices, learning new skills, and personal fulfillment — from a historian who had leveraged his academic credentials into guru status. The book became a massive commercial success. As one critic on Reddit observed, Ortaylı had “fully become a cult figure” through “life advice books for the masses that are essentially empty self-help dressed in elite wrapping”. His book İnsan Geleceğini Nasıl Kurar? (“How Does One Build Their Future?”), published in 2022, continued this lucrative trajectory.[23][24][25][26]

The Column and the Brand

Ortaylı’s regular column in Hürriyet, one of Turkey’s largest-circulation dailies, became another pillar of his media empire. His columns ranged from historical commentary to geopolitical pronouncements to the kind of sweeping cultural judgments — on television dramas, education, music — that had little to do with historical research and everything to do with maintaining his status as Turkey’s unofficial national sage. His last column before his final hospitalization was the infamous August 2025 piece on “water wars” that would generate enormous political backlash.[27][28][29]

Academic Criticism of the Media Turn

Serious historians viewed this transformation with dismay. Prof. Y. Hakan Erdem of Sabancı University, an Oxford-trained Ottoman historian, published Tarih-Lenk (“Lame History”) in 2008, a book-length critique of popular historians including Ortaylı. Erdem’s central argument was devastating: that Ortaylı’s popular output was methodologically unsound, lacking proper citations and source documentation. As Erdem put it in a later television appearance: “İlber Ortaylı is a historian with a lot of popular output, but it seems to me he is writing down whatever he remembers… a new genre emerged where someone talks, others transcribe it and turn it into a book. But one can make mistakes while speaking”. Erdem concluded that Ortaylı no longer saw himself “as an artisan of history” but as something else entirely — a media personality who happened to hold an academic title.[30][31][16]

The critique cut deeper than style. One Reddit thread collecting criticisms noted: “most of his books don’t even have a bibliography,” and that “he evades historical questions, circling around them without giving the asked answer”. The accusation was not merely that Ortaylı had become a popularizer, but that in becoming one, he had abandoned the methodological rigor that separated history from entertainment.[23]

Ideological Provocations

The Kurdish Question: Demographic Engineering as Punditry

Ortaylı’s most explosive recent controversy came in August 2025, when he published a column in Hürriyet titled “Water Wars Crisis” that ostensibly addressed Turkey’s drought problems but contained a startling proposal: that “emptying villages” in the Euphrates and Tigris basin should be repopulated by importing Uyghur farmers from China and Kyrgyz herders from Central Asia.[32][27]

The full passage was unambiguous: “The Euphrates and Tigris basin is of vital importance for Turkey both technically, demographically, and politically. The emptying villages here must be filled without delay with the fraternal potential population from Asia. The industrious farmers of the fertile Uyghur region, worn down by China’s nuclear tests, must be brought to Turkey quickly. Kyrgyz experts in animal husbandry must also operate on these lands”. He added that “in the regions where the terrorist organization once tried to establish dominance, not the slightest concession should be given”.[27]

The reaction was fierce and cross-partisan. DEM Party MP Meral Danış Beştaş called the proposal “racist, divisive, and an approach that annihilates human dignity,” stating: “Divisiveness is precisely this racist discourse itself”. Even AKP MKYK member Orhan Miroğlu, a Kurdish politician within the ruling party, responded by sharing a video of Kyrgyz newlyweds in Şanlıurfa speaking fluent Kurdish, writing: “This must be a complete disappointment for İlber Ortaylı!” and calling the proposal an act of “colossal foolishness” that merely “feeds chauvinist sentiments”. Journalist and former Erdoğan advisor Akif Beki wrote that Ortaylı, the “popular history oracle, cleverly transformed the water problem into a Kurdish question debate with his sharp wit. As if the issue was whether it would be the Turk or the Kurd who would irrigate the field”.[33][34][35][32]

This was not an isolated slip. Ortaylı had long held positions on Kurdish identity that critics described as chauvinist. He explicitly rejected the term “Türkiyeli” (from Turkey) as an inclusive identity marker, declaring in 2025: “There is no such thing as ‘Türkiyeli.’ ‘I am a Türkiyeli Kurd, you will be a Türkiyeli Turk’ — there is no such thing”. In a 2023 appearance on CNN Türk, he stated that “some ethnic groups have lost the capacity to be together with Turkey” — a remark widely interpreted as referring to Kurds. These positions amounted to a consistent pattern: the deployment of historical authority to legitimize ethno-nationalist framings of Turkey’s most sensitive political question.[36][19]

Armenian Genocide Denial

Ortaylı was a committed denier of the Armenian Genocide, a fact acknowledged even by his Wikipedia entry, which categorizes him among “Deniers of the Armenian genocide”. His denialist discourse, however, went beyond the standard Turkish state position into territory that was distinctly Ortaylı — erudite-sounding, but intellectually dishonest.[7]

In a 2017 symposium at Istanbul University, he stated: “The Armenian question remained as a genocide on Turkey’s head. While it was a wartime deportation and an event in which both sides slaughtered each other, it is falsely presented as ‘Turkish genocide.’ The real purpose here is to cover up the Nazi Holocaust”. This argument — that the Armenian Genocide was “invented” by Germany to deflect from the Holocaust — was not only historically baseless but, as the Jewish media outlet Avlaremoz documented, constituted an instrumentalization of the Holocaust itself.[37][38]

Avlaremoz‘s 2019 analysis was particularly damning. It showed that Ortaylı, on CNN Türk, claimed the Armenian Genocide allegations were backed by Germany specifically to distract from the Holocaust. He then stated: “The Holocaust, incredible savagery, not just the Jews, what do you want from the poor Gypsies?” — a formulation that, as Avlaremoz observed, seemed to imply that while Roma victims were “innocent,” Jews perhaps had something coming to them. The article referenced historian Rıfat Bali’s 2010 article in Toplumsal Tarih, which compiled multiple instances of Ortaylı’s antisemitic remarks — from getting basic facts about Turkish-Jewish history wrong (the year of the Thrace Pogrom, the name of Elza Niyego) to making classic antisemitic claims about Jewish economic power.[37]

In 2023, commenting on Disney Plus’s cancellation of an Atatürk series amid Armenian Genocide controversies, Ortaylı simply declared on Sözcü TV: “The official position does not accept Armenian claims. The allegations put forward about our Atatürk have no relation to objective historical realities”.[20]

The Flexible Loyalties of a “State Intellectual”

A recurring critique of Ortaylı concerned his ideological flexibility — his ability to position himself advantageously regardless of which political wind blew. As one Reddit critic observed: “If a person was in close contact with both the [Gülen] community, Atatürk, and Erdoğan, that person is two-faced”. The commenter noted that “in his time he sidled up to the infamous [Gülen] community, then played Kemalist, and when that wasn’t enough, ran to give conferences whenever Erdoğan called.”[39]

Indeed, Ortaylı’s political positioning was a masterclass in hedging. In 2018, he offered a remarkably sympathetic reading of Erdoğan’s sudden embrace of Atatürk, explaining that “Erdoğan saw that there are people in his party he never approved of” — essentially providing intellectual cover for the AKP’s opportunistic Kemalist turn. Yet in 2020, he appeared at an İYİ Parti event with Meral Akşener, criticizing the presidential system and declaring: “Nobody has the right to say ‘what I said is correct'”. He attacked an AKP deputy’s remarks as “insolence and impropriety” on Fatih Altaylı’s show, even as he had repeatedly been a welcome guest in government circles.[40][41][42][43]

A lengthy Reddit analysis from 2025 captured the critique well: “He has long been essentially the state’s official historian. He dominated the media, his image became synonymous with the historian image. He was fully cultified through his life-advice books for the masses… All of this makes him an establishment intellectual. There is nothing about him that contradicts the established order. He specifically substitutes document fetishism for the critical potential that popular historiography could contain. Yet, let alone which document says what — most of his books don’t even have a bibliography”.[23]

Other Provocations: Acemoğlu and Beyond

Ortaylı’s penchant for intellectual bullying extended to figures of global stature. In November 2024, he attacked Nobel laureate Daron Acemoğlu in his Hürriyet column, calling his historiographic influences — specifically Erik Jan Zürcher, one of the foremost Western historians of modern Turkey — “a very handicapped author” (çok özürlü bir yazar) who was a “limited source commentator and copyist”. He condescendingly suggested that as “a Nobel Prize-winning scientist, Acemoğlu should be expected to make more balanced and settled assessments.” He dismissed Acemoğlu’s writings on the Ottoman economy and Hungary as “empty in terms of content”. The attack was characteristic: marshaling his cultural authority to dismiss a globally recognized scholar whose conclusions threatened nationalist historical narratives.[44]

The Paradox of Ortaylı’s Legacy

Ortaylı’s death closes a chapter in Turkish intellectual life that reveals as much about Turkey’s knowledge culture as about the man himself. His genuine early scholarly contributions to Ottoman administrative history are not in dispute. His role in bringing historical consciousness to Turkish popular culture — however imperfectly — is a real achievement. His polyglot erudition was extraordinary.

But the overwhelming weight of his later career tells a different story: of a media ecosystem that rewarded performative intellectualism over rigor; of a figure who leveraged academic credentials earned decades ago to pronounce on subjects far beyond his expertise; of an ideologue who used historical authority to reinforce ethno-nationalist positions on Kurds, Armenians, and Jews; and of a public intellectual whose flexible political loyalties served the perpetuation of his own celebrity above any consistent principle.

The artdog Istanbul obituary, published the day of his death, offered the conventional encomium: “Turkey has lost not only a historian but also an intellectual who knew how to speak with memory”. A more honest assessment might be that Turkey lost a figure who demonstrated how easily historical knowledge could be converted into media spectacle, and how eagerly a society would consume that spectacle while leaving its most urgent historical reckonings unaddressed.[8]

As Prof. Hakan Erdem warned in Tarih-Lenk, the danger was never Ortaylı himself — it was the culture that made him possible, that elevated an increasingly unmoored media personality to the status of civilizational oracle, and that treated the correction of his errors as a form of lèse-majesté. İlber Ortaylı was, in many ways, not the historian Turkey needed, but the one it was willing to accept.[31][16]

References

1. Turkish historian Ilber Ortayli dies at 78 after health complications – Renowned Turkish historian Ilber Ortayli has died at 78 after recent health complications, ending a …
2. Tarihçi ve yazar İlber Ortaylı entübe edildi – Anadolu Ajansı – Tarihçi ve yazar Prof. Dr. İlber Ortaylı tedavi gördüğü hastanede entübe edildi. Hikmet Faruk Başer …
3. İlber Ortaylı Neden Öldü? İlber Ortaylı’nın Hastalığı Neydi? – Tarihçi yazar İlber Ortaylı 13 Mart 2026 tarihinde hayatını kaybetti. İlber Ortaylı neden öldü? İlbe…
4. Hayatını Kaybeden İlber Ortaylı’nın Ailesinden İlk Açıklama – İlber Ortaylı’nın ailesinden yapılan açıklama şöyle: Ailemizin büyüğü İlber Ortaylı’yı 13 Mart 2026 …
5. Hayatını Kaybeden İlber Ortaylı’nın Son Videolu Paylaşımı Yeniden … – 78 yaşındaki ünlü tarihçi İlber Ortaylı hayatını kaybetti. Geçtiğimiz ocak ayında prostat ameliyatı …
6. Tarihçi yazar İlber Ortaylı’nın tedavisi ‘entübe’ şekilde sürüyor – Tarihçi yazar İlber Ortaylı’nın tedavisi ‘entübe’ şekilde sürüyor · Yazan, BBC News Türkçe; Bildirdi…
7. İlber Ortaylı – Wikipedia – İlber Ortaylı is a Turkish historian and professor of history of Crimean Tatar origin at the Medipol…
8. İlber Ortaylı: 1947-2026 – – Historian and writer Prof. Dr. İlber Ortaylı, who had been receiving treatment in intensive care for…
9. » İlber Ortaylı’nın Kaleminden Tanzimat Devrinde Osmanlı Mahallî İdareleri
10. İlber Ortaylı – İlber Ortaylı: Ünlü tarihçi ve yazarın hayatı, çalışmaları ve ödülleri.
11. TANZİMAT DEVRİNDE OSMANLI MAHALLİ İDARELERİ … – 2011 19. yüzyıla kadar Osmanlı İmparatorluğu şehirleri, klasik geleneksel yapı ile idare edilmiştir….
12. OTTOMAN STUDIES / İLBER ORTAYLI – This collection of papers by Prof. İlber Ortaylı mainly deals with the political, economic, social a…
13. imparatorluğun en uzun yüzyılı – Ekşi Sözlük – ilber ortaylı’nın 19. yy osmanlı modernleşmesini ve osmanlı’da merkezi yönetime geçişi anlatan hoş b…
14. (PDF) THE EMPIRE’S LONGEST CENTURY – İLBER ORTAYLI – This book is an attempt to understand how a classic Mediterranean empire faced up to the conditions …
15. İLBER ORTAYLI’DAN “İMPARATORLUĞUN EN UZUN YÜZYILI” – Yazarın sonuç bölümünde vurguladığı bir husus, modern asrın toplumları artık tarihi yaşamayıp, yapma…
16. İlber Ortaylı’nın Tarihçiliği Hakkında Az Bilinen Gerçekler – Kelâmbaz – İlber Ortaylı ve tarihçiliği hakkında neler biliyorsunuz? Kitaplarını okurken kaynaklarından ne kada…
17. İlber Ortaylı: The man who introduced history to popular … – One of the most popular historians, in the recent turkish agenda, academic and writer İlber Ortaylı …
18. Tarihin kitlelere ulaştırılması ve popüler tarihçilik odağında İlber Ortaylı ve katkıları – Bu araştırmada, tarihçi İlber Ortaylının Türkiyede tarihin popüler hale gelmesindeki rolü incelenm…
19. İlber Ortaylı’dan çok konuşulacak Kürt sorunu açıklaması – İlber Ortaylı’dan çok konuşulacak Kürt sorunu açıklaması; “Bazı etnik grupların…”
20. İlber Ortaylı SÖZCÜ TV’de konuştu: Ermeniler ile Türkler birlikte bu işleri araştırmalı – Dailymotion Video – Prof. Dr. İlber Ortaylı, Amerikalı Dijital yayın ağı Disney Plus’ın Atatürk dizisini iptal etmesini …
21. Türkiye Tezatlar Ülkesi | İlber Ortaylı Cahille Sohbeti Kestim – İlber Ortaylı, Cahille Sohbeti Kestim’in bu haftaki bölümünde müzik kültürlerimiz başta olmak üzere …
22. Osmanlı’nın En Parlak Dönemi | İlber Ortaylı İle Cahille Sohbeti Kestim – İlber Ortaylı, Cahille Sohbeti Kestim’in yeni bölümünde Osmanlı’nın en parlak dönemini anlattı.

00:…

23. İlber Ortaylı’nın yandaş çıkmasına şaşıranlara (gecikmiş) literatür önerisi – İlber Ortaylı’nın yandaş çıkmasına şaşıranlara (gecikmiş) literatür önerisi
24. Bir Ömür Nasıl Yaşanır Kitabı – Trendyol – Bu kitap, okuyuculara hayat yolculuklarında rehberlik etmekte ve kişisel gelişim süreçlerinde yol gö…
25. Bir Ömür Nasıl Yaşanır? – Bkmkitap – İlber Hoca bu kitapta, bir insanın, çocukluktan itibaren hayatın hemen her alanında ihtiyaç duyacağı…
26. İlber Ortaylı – Author of Bir Ömür Nasıl Yaşanır?, Gazi Mustafa Kemal Atatürk, and Türklerin Tarihi
27. İlber Ortaylı: Fırat ve Dicle havzasında boşalan köylere Uygur ve … – Fırat ve Dicle havzasında boşalan köylere Uygurlu çiftçilerin, hayvancılık konusunda uzman olduğunu …
28. İlber Ortaylı’nin Hürriyet Gazetesindeki tüm yazıları – İlber Ortaylı – Hürriyet Gazetesindeki tüm yazı arşivine bu sayfadan ulaşabilirsiniz.
29. İlber Ortaylı bütün köşe yazılarını buradan takip edin. – İlber Ortaylı bütün köşe yazılarını com dan takip edin.
30. Tarihçi Hakan Erdem, İlber Ortaylı’yı Neden Eleştirdi? – “Başka Sulara Yelken Açmış Bir Tarihçi Görmekteyim”

Teke Tek’te Fatih Altaylı’nın konuğu Hakan Erde…

31. Tarihçi Erdem’den kavga çıkaracak sözler… – Tarihçi Hakan Erdem, Soner Yalçın için ‘Tarihin A, B, C’sini bilmiyor’ dedi.
32. “Fırat Dicle havzasına Uygur transferi” önerisi “açıkça ırkçı ve bölücü” – İlber Ortaylı’nın durup dururken, “Fırat-Dicle havzasında köyler boşaldı” diyerek, Uygurları Çin’den…
33. DEM Parti’den İlber Ortaylı’nın önerisine sert tepki – Prof. Dr. İlber Ortaylı’nın, “Fırat ve Dicle havzasındaki boşalan köylere Uygur ve Kırgızların yerle…
34. İlber Ortaylı’ya Tepkiler Dinmiyor – Kuraklığa dikkat çekerek Uygur ve Kırgız çiftçilerin Fırat ve Dicle havzasında boşalan köylere yerle…
35. AKP MKYK Üyesi Miroğlu’ndan “Fırat ve Dicle havzasına Uygurları … – Dr. İlber Ortaylı’ya tepki gösterdi. Miroğlu, “Kırgızları, Uygurlarla beraber getirip Dicle- Fırat h…
36. İlber Ortaylı: “Türkiyeli diye bir şey yok, saçma. ‘Ben Türkiyeli Kürt’üm, sen de Türkiyeli Türk olacaksın’ diye bir şey yok.” – İlber Ortaylı: “Türkiyeli diye bir şey yok, saçma. ‘Ben Türkiyeli Kürt’üm, sen de Türkiyeli Türk ola…
37. İlber Ortaylı ve Yine Antisemitizm: Ermeni Soykırımı İnkarına Holokost’u Alet Etti -Avlaremoz – İlber Ortaylı ve Yine Antisemitizm: Ermeni Soykırımı İnkarına Holokost’u Alet Etti
38. asıl amaç, nazi holokostu’nu (yahudi soykırımı) örtmek – “ASIL AMAÇ, NAZİ HOLOKOSTU’NU (YAHUDİ SOYKIRIMI) ÖRTMEK”
39. ilber ortaylı fetö ilişkisi – (bkz: vay orospu çocuğu)
40. İlber Ortaylı, Erdoğan’ın ‘Atatürk’ çıkışını değerlendirdi – Ulusal Kanal – Ulusal Kanal
41. İlber Ortaylı, Erdoğan’ın ‘Atatürk’ çıkışını yorumladı: AKP’de hiç tasvip etmediği insanlar olduğunu gördü – “Atatürk bir kadınla flört etmeyi de biliyordu, arkadaş olmayı da”
42. İlber Ortaylı AKP’li ismi topa tuttu: ‘Küstahlık ve edepsizlik…’ – Fatih Altaylı’nın sunduğu Teke Tek programında soruları yanıtlayan Prof. Dr. İlber Ortaylı, AKP Gene…
43. İlber Ortaylı ‘dan Erdoğan ‘ı Kızdıracak Sözler! – İlber Ortaylı ‘dan Erdoğan ‘ı Kızdıracak Sözler!

Prof. Dr. İlber Ortaylı , İYİ Parti ‘nin düzenledi…

44. İlber Ortaylı’dan Daron Acemoğlu eleştirisi: ‘Özürlü bir yazarın etkisinde’ – Prof. Dr. İlber Ortaylı, Daron Acemoğlu’nun Atatürk’e yönelik eleştirilerine sert tepki gösterdi. Or…