#Europe agenda: [Article] “Law, politics, and efficacy at the European Court of Human Rights

Law, politics, and efficacy at the European Court of Human Rights


Why do people experience legal institutions as effective sites for political and social transformation? How do people translate political and ethical goals into modalities of law? In Europe many have responded to a widespread sense of political crisis by turning to legal remedies and judicial institutions. One of these institutions, the European Court of Human Rights, provides shared frameworks for combating people’s sense of impasse or decline. People experience the Court as a successful rights institution because it shapes and generates shared semiotic forms and repertoires. Through these, lawyers, judges, and rights advocates construct and recognize their actions as efficacious. Yet the experience of efficacy is an unequally shared resource. For some, legal frameworks are the condition of possibility for ethical and professional engagement. But for others, engaging with the law produces frustration and exclusion. Moreover, engaging in judicialized politics shapes some harms as legally legible and actionable, while it shapes others as tragedies beyond reach. [lawpoliticsliberalismjudicialization of politicsjusticehuman rightsefficacymetapragmaticsEurope]

Since the first case in northern Italy a year ago the lives of Europeans have been changed forever.

Spain: Rapper’s jailing, riots lead to rift within government

Protests against the arrest of rapper Pablo Hasél have gripped Spain, with dozens arrested during clashes with police.

1 thought on “#Europe agenda: [Article] “Law, politics, and efficacy at the European Court of Human Rights

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: