
Professor Sami Selçuk is a former chairman the Supreme Court of Appeals, which has become a party to current discussions.
Reactions are mounting in opposition to a statement released by the Supreme Court of Appeals Board of Chairmen. The statement, released on Wednesday, contained severe criticism of the ruling Justice and Development Party (AK Party) government, including accusations of bringing the judiciary under its control.
By HASAN BÜLENT KARAMAN, SABAH
We keep living and re-living the same truths, over and over again. The Turkish justice system, acting along the lines of its own beliefs, is engaged in ideological maneuvering.
By MEHMET ALTAN, STAR
We have become so very accustomed to the politicization of our justice system that we even try, through the lens of political conjecture, to understand developments that shouldn't ever even occur in a state of justice...
By İSMET BERKAN, RADİKAL
A democracy needs to be able to lead and to guide; it needs to have systematic preventive action taken against broken mechanisms and "inner-palace" games.
As Turkey was trying to recover from the shock brought about by an indictment seeking to close the ruling Justice and Development Party (AK Party), the Supreme Court of Appeals shook Ankara once more with a memorandum-like statement on Wednesday which targeted the government without openly naming it.
Haşim Kılıç, the chief justice of the 11-member Constitutional Court, has said the ongoing closure case against the ruling Justice and Development Party, or AKP, will not negatively affect Turkish
Turkey's top jurists made very harsh accusations against the government yesterday, claiming that it exerted systematic pressure on the judiciary on the eve of crucial rulings. “The latest developments are enough to prove that the
Justice and Development Party (AK Party) ministers and senior party members are being taken to task and asked to answer a crucial question according to some press reports: "Who spilled the beans to a Reuter news agency reporter?"
Turkey's destiny is presumably in the hands of 11 judges. Regardless of what the result turns out to be, the aftershocks caused by the proposed ban of the Justice and Development Party (AK Party) keep coming.
The processes of trial and punishment have been around since the creation of man and will most probably remain with mankind forever. A fair trial stands out as a significant matter, whose availability is necessary for the survival of countries and the sound operation of an institutional framework.

Turkish Parliament Speaker Köksal Toptan made a controversial proposal concerning the closure case against the Justice and Development Party (AK Party).
Ali H. Aslan, a young columnist for Zaman and Today's Zaman, is one of the most successful journalists taking the pulse of Washington. Yasemin Çongar, who writes for the Taraf daily, is another colleague who closely follows the transatlantic developments despite having returned to Turkey.
By AHMET TAŞGETİREN, BUGÜN
Yes, the Supreme Court of Appeals Board of Chairmen has taken its place on the front with the statement it released. The language of the statement is full of polemic.
A harsh statement released by the Supreme Court of Appeals Board of Chairmen on Wednesday, criticizing the ruling Justice and Development Party (AK Party) and even directing accusations at it, has once again brought the role of the Turkish judiciary into the spotlight.

An increasing number of people hold that there is a clear connection between a lawsuit filed with the Constitutional Court asking to annul amendments made to the Constitution lifting a long-standing headscarf ban at universities and a closure case pending against the Justice and Development Party (AK Party) now that the court rapporteur has submitted his report.
Cengiz ÇANDAR
By NASUHİ GÜNGÖR, STAR
Societal support for the AK Party is increasing, and many of the party's top-ranked members point these days to the expected societal support for the AK Party as a way out of the current situation.
Murat YETKİN
Finally Haşim Kılıç, the chief judge of the Constitutional Court, declared that the high court will in the first week of June issue its verdict on the demand for the annulment of constitutional amendments package the ruling Justice and Development Party (AKP) legislated in cooperation with the opposition Nationalist Movement Party (MHP) in hopes of legalizing “for now” wearing of the turban, the Islamist headgear, in universities by female students. As it has become a tradition of the Constitutional Court to have hearings on cases mostly only on Thursdays, we may comfortably assume that even if what's said by Kılıç might not reflect the collective view of the 11 members of the
By HASAN CEMAL,MİLLİYET
Let's consider the AK Party being forced to close. Who will form the new government? It will once again be formed by the AK Party group, and the prime minister will emerge from this group.
As the Constitutional Court's 11 top judges started reading the report on the demand for the annulment of constitutional amendments legislated by the ruling Justice and Development Party (AKP) with the support of the opposition Nationalist Movement Party (MHP) in hopes of paving the way to the lifting of the turban ban at universities (only there for now), speculations started to spread in Ankara that probability of a “third way” was over 50 percent. What's that third way? It is rather complicated. According to one claim the two sides of the polarized real politics of the country have reached a compromise deal according to which while the government takes steps to defuse tension and provide
Ahu ÖZYURT
Cüneyt ÜLSEVER
Israel and Syria say they are holding indirect, Turkish-mediated talks to reach a comprehensive peace agreement.
By MUSTAFA KARAALİOĞLU, STAR
Looking at the recent months of tension in Turkey, it would be wrong to conclude that there are two central axes that counterbalance one another in this nation and that one of them is secularism.
By NAZLI ILICAK, SABAH
Rıza Türkmen, a former judge at the European Court of Human Rights, said the court adjudicates cases regarding party closures according to its own jurisprudence, not the Venice criteria, which set conditions on party closures. (May 19, Milliyet daily)
In an advertisement that appeared in French daily Le Monde, the Kurdish Institute of Paris and deputies of Turkey's pro-Kurdish party (DTP) called for an international mediator who could
Mehmet Ali Birand
Mustafa AKYOL
İlter TÜRKMEN
Semih İDİZ
Burak BEKDİL
What's right and what's wrong appears to have been mixed up in the rather wild atmosphere Turkey was plunged into all of a sudden in February when our Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan remembered on a visit to Spain that his government indeed had a headscarf, turban, Islamist headgear – or whatever one would like to call it – agenda for which it waited with “dervish patience” for more than five years but time has ripened enough to act on it despite continued secularist sentiments that it was symbol of political Islam… “What if it is a symbol!” he had said.The opposition Nationalist Movement Party (MHP) allowed itself – indeed volunteered – to be used by the ruling Justice and Develop