Interview #34: Oktay Ekşi and Interview #35: Etyen Mahçupyan
Just came back from TESEV's headquarters in Karaköy. After the Hrant Dink assassination, Mr. Mahçupyan became the chief editor of the Armenian Turkish newspaper, Agos. He was a regular columnist for Zaman daily, and before that he contributed to Radikal. He is known to have radical democratic views and according to a Vikipedi entry his polemic with liberal scholar Atilla Yayla a few years ago was one of the most of productive intellectual exchanges in recent times. Anyway, he is also in charge with some TESEV projects and i visited him there. The interview was one of the least productive ones I ever conducted. He was in a hurry and he did not think he could be helpful. Even the very short exchange of views is a gem for me but i was quited disappointed, i have to say.
After a bit of waiting, thanks to Prof. Haluk Şahin, Mr. Ekşi invited me to his office in Hürriyet building and we had a relatively successfull conversation. Among the interviewees so far, he is one of the most Euro-sceptic columnists. Though this was particularly what I wanted to achieve. So i am glad to have him in my list. Mr. Ekşi a very well established columnist and he is also currently the head of the Turkish Press Council....
Comments
and where exactly is this interview so that i can read? i am using ie7 and i encountered "no link" problem before, but i dont know if i cant see the link or you didnt provide.
Posted by: super hero | July 6, 2007 12:41 PM
sorry man, i do not provide the interviews. this is related to the research ethics issues. but hopefully in a year you will be able to write my dissertation and see who says what:)
Posted by: erkan | July 6, 2007 02:14 PM
Yes but, why should somebody else write your dissertation? :-)
Posted by: Mitat Yerli | July 6, 2007 04:55 PM
not a good deduction at all! :)
Posted by: erkan | July 6, 2007 11:22 PM
Not a good deduction? What deduction are you talking about? You talk about an interview that you cannot publish for another year or two because of some obscure research ethics issue. Can there be any worse 'deduction' than that?
Posted by: Mitat Yerli | July 8, 2007 01:46 AM
'obscure ethical' issue?
Eplain?
Operor non ineo pro gnarus!
Posted by: Hans A.H.C. de Wit | July 8, 2007 09:59 AM
I got the 'Operor non ineo pro gnarus!' part but what does 'Eplain?' mean?
Posted by: Mitat Yerli | July 8, 2007 08:37 PM